Something Powerful

Tell The Reader More

The headline and subheader tells us what you're offering, and the form header closes the deal. Over here you can explain why your offer is so great it's worth filling out a form for.

Remember:

  • Bullets are great
  • For spelling out benefits and
  • Turning visitors into leads.

R-448A: Pros, Cons, & Comparisons to Other Refrigerants

Posted by Super Radiator Coils on Oct 14, 2022 8:41:47 AM

Our refrigerant focus series consists of deep dives into the history, properties, suitable applications and pros and cons of some of today’s common refrigerants. This installment will focus on R-448A.

History of R-448A as a Refrigerant

R-448A was developed between 2010 and 2015, the result of a collaborative effort among Honeywell, the University of Maryland, and Oak Ridge National Laboratory’s Building Technologies Research & Integration Center.

The stated goal of this research was to develop next-gen refrigerants, the performance of which would allow for a 50% reduction in energy consumption of the equipment in which it was used. Specifically, this work sought to synthesize a refrigerant to replace R-22, R-404A, and R-507 in low-to-medium temperature applications, such as supermarket refrigeration.

Properties of R-448A

R-448A is a low-toxicity, non-flammable blended refrigerant, classified by ASHRAE into safety group A1. It's is a 5-part zeotropic blend, made using a combination of hydrofluorocarbon and hydrofluoroolefin constituents at the concentrations outlined below.

  • R-32 (26%)
  • R-125 (26%)
  • R-134a (21%)
  • R-1234ze (7%)
  • R-1234yf (20%)

The table below shows R-448A’s properties compared to the properties of the refrigerants it is intended to replace.

 

R-448A R-404A R-22

Formula

R-32 (26%)

R-125 (26%)

R-134a (21%)

R-1234ze (7%)

R-1234yf (20%)

R-125 (44%)

R-143A (52%)

R-134A (4%)

CHCLF2

Molecular weight (g/mol)

86.3

97.6

86.47

Boiling Temp ˚F (˚C)

-43.27 (-45.9)

-51 (-46.2)

-41.4 (-40.8)

Critical Temp ˚F (˚C)

182.6 (83.7)

161.7 (72)

205 (96.1)

Critical pressure, PSI (Bar)

675.9 (46.6)

541 (37.7)

723.7 (49.9)

Global Warming Potential

~1320

3922

~1810

Ozone Depletion Percentage

0

0

0.05

ASHRAE Safety Group

A1

A1

A1

 

Performance Comparison of R-448A vs. R-404 & R-22

For a performance comparison, we’ve run a theoretical 6” x 70” 8-row copper-aluminum evaporator through our coil selection software, Enterprise. The coil’s airside and tube-side requirements are below and the coil’s rating is below that. 

Inputs

Airside

Tube-side

Airflow

4,000 SCFM

Refrigerant suction temp

35 ˚F

Target capacity

140,000 Btu/Hr.

Degrees superheat

6 ˚F

Entering air temp (dry bulb)

85 ˚F

Liquid temp

100 ˚F

Leaving air temp (dry blub)

55 ˚F

 

 

Air pressure

14.696 PSIA

 

 

 

Performance Comparison: R-448A vs. R-404A

 

R-448A

R-404A

Difference (%)

Difference (abs.)

Coil capacity

145,558 Btu/hr.

140,680 Btu/hr.

3.3%

4,878 Btu/hr.

Leaving air temp.

51.6°F

52.7°F

-2.6%

1.1°F

Refrigerant inlet temperature

33.7°F

42.7°F

-27%

9°F

Refrigerant pressure drop

7.694 PSI/coil

13.419 PSI/coil

-74%

5.725 PSI/coil

Refrigerant mass flow

2,179 lb./hr.

3,228 lb./hr.

-48%

1,049 lb./hr.

Circuit loading

12,130 Btu/hr.

11,723 Btu/hr.

3.3%

407 Btu/hr.

 

Performance Comparison: R-448A vs. R-22

 

R-448A

R-22

Difference (%)

Difference (abs.)

Coil capacity

145,558 Btu/hr.

144,347 Btu/hr.

0.8%

1,211 Btu/hr.

Leaving air temp.

51.6°F

51.9°F

0.6%

0.3°F

Refrigerant inlet temperature

33.7°F

40.1°F

19%

6.4°F

Refrigerant pressure drop

7.694 PSI/coil

6.905 PSI/coil

-10.2%

0.789 PSI/coil

Refrigerant mass flow

2,179 lb./hr.

2,082 lb./hr.

-4.4%

97 lb./hr.

Circuit loading

12,130 Btu/hr.

12,029 Btu/hr.

-0.8%

101 Btu/hr.

 

Pros & Cons of R-448A

R-448A: Pros

The chief benefit of R-448A is its lessened environmental impact relative to the refrigerants it was designed to replace. It’s non-ozone depleting and has a global warming potential of 1320, which is 37% less than R-22 and 197% less than R-404.

And, while R-448A’s performance compares similarly to R-22, that refrigerant has been nearly totally phased out. And when compared to the less-regulated R-404A, R-448A resulted in a per-coil capacity increase of just over 3%. R-448A also demonstrated a significantly lower (74%) pressure drop in our hypothetical application.

R-448A: Cons

One minor drawback of R-448A is that, due to it being a zeotropic mixture, it does have a temperature glide of between 5 and 8˚F – a variable that merits attention when designing equipment.

Don’t get left out in the cold when it comes to heat transfer information. To stay up to date on a variety of topics on the subject, subscribe to The Super Blog, our technical blog, Doctor's Orders, and follow us on LinkedIn, Twitter, and YouTube.